Even 1 drink a day may raise risk of breast cancer

Posted by david | Posted in Alchohol, Article, Breast Cancer, Health, News, beer | Posted on 30-09-2007

101336 Even 1 drink a day may raise risk of breast cancer - Doctor HealthBARCELONA, Spain — All types of alcohol — wine, beer and liquor — add equally to the risk of women developing breast cancer, U.S. researchers said Thursday.

Previous studies have shown a link between alcohol consumption and breast cancer, but there have been conflicting messages about whether some kinds of alcohol were more dangerous than others.
The researchers, led by Dr. Arthur Klatsky of the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program in Oakland, Calif., revealed their findings at a conference in Barcelona.
Researchers analyzed the drinking habits of 70,033 women of various races from 1978 to 1985. By 2004, 2,829 had been diagnosed with breast cancer. Klatsky and his colleagues looked at which types of alcohol the women drank and their total alcohol intake. They compared it with that of women who had less than one drink a day.
They found no difference in the risk of developing breast cancer among women who drank wine, beer or liquor. Compared with light drinkers — those who had less than one drink a day — women who had one or two drinks a day increased their risk by 10 percent. Women who had more than three drinks a day raised their risk by 30 percent.
It is not clear how alcohol contributes to breast cancer, but some think it raises hormone levels in the blood to levels that could cause cancer.

Any Type of Alcohol Drink Raises Breast Cancer Risk, New Study

Posted by david | Posted in Article, Breast Cancer, News | Posted on 30-09-2007

A large US study suggests that it did not matter whether women drank beer, wine or spirits, they all raised the risk of breast cancer to the same extent. And more than three alcoholic drinks a day raised breast cancer risk by 30 per cent, compared to women who had less than one drink a day, said the researchers.

The study, one of the largest of its kind, was presented yesterday, Thursday, at the European Cancer Conference (ECCO 14) in Barcelona, Spain, and is the work of Dr Arthur Klatsky, adjunct investigator in the Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, US, and colleagues.

Klatsky and colleagues showed that it made no difference what type of alcoholic drink the women had, it was the fact they contained ethyl alcohol that mattered, and how much was consumed.

The increase in breast cancer risk due to three or more alcoholic drinks a day is similar to that posed by smoking a pack of cigarettes or more a day said Klatsky. It is also similar to the risk posed by taking oestrogenic hormones he added.

Speaking at a news briefing, Klatsky explained that:

“Population studies have consistently linked drinking alcohol to an increased risk of female breast cancer.”

“But there has been little data, most of it conflicting, about an independent role played by the choice of beverage type,” said Klatsky.

The researchers studied the drinking habits of 70,033 women of different ethnic origin who underwent health exams during the period 1978 to 1985 and looked at the breast cancer incidence in the cohort in subsequent years.

They found that 2,829 of the women had been diagnosed with breast cancer by 2004.

The results showed that:

  • There was no difference in breast cancer risk between wine, beer and spirit consumption.
  • Even between red and white wine, the impact was the same.
  • In terms of overall alcohol intake, women who had between one and two drinks a day had a 10 per cent higher breast cancer risk compared to those who had one drink a day.
  • The risk went up to 30 per cent for women who had more than three drinks a day.
  • The results were the same for all age and ethnic groups.

Commenting on the results, Klatsky said that:

“Statistical analyses limited to strata of wine preferrers, beer preferrers, spririts preferrers or non-preferrers each showed that heavier drinking, compared to light drinking, was related to breast cancer risk in each group.”

“This strongly confirms the relation of ethyl alcohol per se to increased risk,” he added.

Although only a small proportion of women are heavy drinkers, and the risk of breast cancer varies among different groups, a 30 per cent increase in relative risk from drinking heavily probably translates to 5 per cent of all breast cancers being due to this habit.

Klatsky and colleagues have previously linked red wine to reduced heart attack incidence, and he said that different biological mechanisms probably explain the different effects.

The protective effect on the heart from red wine is probably due to increased HDL (”good”) cholesterol, reduced blood clotting and reduced diabetes. But none of these has been shown to have anything to do with breast cancer, he said.

“The coronary benefit from drinking red wine may also be related to favourable drinking patterns common among wine drinkers or to the favourable traits of wine drinkers, as evidenced by US and Danish studies,” said Klatsky.

Emphasizing that all medical advice should be tailored to the individual patient, Klatsky added that the only general statement that could be made from the findings was that it showed more reasons why “heavy drinkers should quit or cut down”.

Klatsky concluded his conference presentation:

“This has been fascinating research. Our group has been involved in studies of alcohol drinking and health for more than three decades, including in the area of heart disease. We are fortunate to have data available about a large, multi-ethnic population with a variety of drinking habits.”

According to a report in WebMD, Dr Shumin Zhang, associate professor of medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, said the findings were “generally consistent with previous research”.

Zhang, who did not take part in the research conducted by Klatsky and colleagues, has also found a link between frequent alcohol consumption and elevated breast cancer risk, said WebMD

Written by: Catharine Paddock
Source: Medical News Today

Study of Malaria Parasite in Humans Instead of in Lab Leads to New Insights

Posted by sara | Posted in Malaria | Posted on 18-09-2007

The malaria parasite has been studied for decades, but surprisingly, little is known about how it behaves in humans to cause disease.

In a groundbreaking study published November 28, 2007 in the advance online edition of Nature, an international research team has for the first time measured which of the parasite’s genes are turned on or off during actual infection in humans, not in cell cultures, unearthing surprising behaviors and opening a window on the most critical aspects of parasite biology.

That insight springs from the genomic analysis of parasites in their natural state, derived directly from patients residing in Senegal, and also from the researchers’ use of innovative computational approaches to interpret their results. These computational methods helped to identify three distinct biological states of the malaria parasite: an active growth-based state, a starvation response and an environmental stress response, presumably related to the body’s inflammatory response to the parasite. This physiological diversity was previously unknown and may help explain the widely varying course of the disease in different patients, from mild, flu-like illness to coma and even death.

“For the first time, we have glimpsed the biology of the malaria parasite in one of its most important environments—humans,” said co-senior author Aviv Regev, a core member of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard and an assistant professor of biology at MIT. “Our unique computational approach holds promise not only for understanding the malaria pathogen, but likely other important microbes as well.”

“This work illustrates the true power that comes from developing the right computational methods and applying them to important biomedical problems,” said co-senior author Jill Mesirov, director of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. “Even more importantly, it reflects scientific research at its best—a global effort that brings together clinicians and researchers with diverse expertise, working directly with patients in areas hardest hit by disease.”

In its natural state, the malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, leads a complicated life. It proceeds through a series of distinct developmental stages both in humans and in mosquitoes, the main vector for disease transmission. Malaria researchers typically circumvent this complexity by studying the parasite in cultured cells. Yet in this artificial setting, few differences have been found in the genes that are turned on or off in various strains of P. falciparum. That uniformity is surprising, because it fails to explain the drastically different courses experienced by malaria patients.

To explore the basis for these differences, first author Johanna Daily, an infectious disease physician at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, and a researcher at both the Harvard School of Public Health and the Broad Institute, set out to observe P. falciparum in its natural environment: the human circulation. Using small samples of blood collected from more than 40 malaria patients in Senegal, Daily and her colleagues worked meticulously to devise a method for isolating genetic material from parasites, allowing them to determine which of the nearly 6,000 P. falciparum genes are switched on or off during infection in humans. Importantly, all of the patients involved in the study harbored similar-looking parasites, yet their symptoms varied widely.

These clinical research efforts were led by Professor Souleymane Mboup and Dr. Daouda Ndiaye at Cheikh Anta Diop University. “This project would not have been possible without the dedicated work of our collaborators in Senegal,” said co-author Dyann Wirth, a professor and chairman of the department of immunology and infectious diseases at the Harvard School of Public Health and the co-director of the Broad Institute’s Infectious Disease Initiative. “We are grateful to them and to the many malaria patients who generously volunteered to participate in this study.”

From the parasites in patients’ blood, the researchers simultaneously measured the activity level, or “expression”, of every P. falciparum gene. Co-author Elizabeth Winzeler, an associate professor at The Scripps Research Institute, led this aspect of the study. “The ability to look across the parasite’s entire genome was essential,” said Winzeler. “We uncovered extraordinary things about parasite biology—things we could not have even imagined.”

Winzeler, who is also head of malaria research at the Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation (GNF), where much of the genomic work was performed, is grateful that organizations like GNF choose to encourage these types of high-risk studies. “We are especially excited about using these observations to guide our drug discovery efforts,” she said.

The key to interpreting these results lay in two computational tools, first developed by Mesirov and her colleagues to study the genomics of human cancer cells. By adapting these tools for malaria, the researchers were able to identify distinct groups of parasites, each marked by characteristic sets of active and inactive genes. The biological underpinnings of these groups were made clearer through a second innovative approach: systematically comparing P. falciparum—whose genes and genome are poorly understood—to the baker’s yeast, an organism that has been extensively characterized at the genetic level. Since the malaria parasite and the baker’s yeast are both single-celled eukaryotes, it is possible they may share some of the same cellular machinery and could also respond in some similar ways to their surroundings.

With this unusual approach, co-senior author Regev and her colleagues were able to describe three different classes of parasites, one of which displayed features associated with a well-known form of parasite metabolism. The other groups, however, were very unusual, reflecting modes of parasite behavior that had never before been described.

One of these novel groups seems to signal parasites that are under extreme environmental stress. Importantly, this group shows a clear correlation with patient symptoms, including high fevers and elevated levels of inflammatory markers in the blood. “This is a remarkable result—it suggests the malaria parasite can sense what is happening within its host and adjust its biology accordingly,” said Daily. “That interaction signals a fundamental shift in the way we think about malaria, one which will hopefully lead to more effective treatments—particularly for the most severe cases of the disease.”

The other parasite group is associated with an alternative form of parasite metabolism, which relies on two specialized cellular compartments called the mitochondria and the apicoplast. That result is particularly surprising since mitochondria in P. falciparum were previously thought to be non-functional.

“For decades, our knowledge of the parasite has been driven solely by studies in cultured cells, not in humans,” said Wirth. “Our work underscores the importance of studying the malaria parasite in its natural environment and will hopefully spark novel approaches to malaria drug discovery.”

Researchers Detail Molecular Structure for Alzheimer’s Neurotoxin

Posted by sara | Posted in Alzheimer | Posted on 13-09-2007

Amyloid plaques, the hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease, are clumps of fiber-like misfolded proteins which many experts think cause this devastating neurodegenerative disease. While effective treatment remains an elusive goal, new research by University of Illinois at Chicago chemists suggests a possible new approach.

Yoshitaka Ishii, associate professor of chemistry, and his students managed to capture and characterize a crucial intermediate step in the formation of amyloid plaque fibers, or fibrils, showing tiny spheres averaging 20 nanometers in diameter assembling into sheet-like structures comparable to that seen in formation of fibrils.

Fibrils made of small proteins called amyloid-beta are toxic to nerve cells, but intermediate spheres, including those identified by Ishii’s group, are more than 10 times as poisonous. That has made the spherical intermediates a new suspect for causing Alzheimer’s disease.

“The problem with studying the structure of this intermediate form is that it’s so unstable,” said Ishii. His team’s approach, he said, was to ‘freeze-trap’ the fleeting intermediate form, then use solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance to determine its structure and electron microscopes to study its morphology, or shape.

Ishii and his coworkers confirmed that the intermediate spherical stage of amyloid is more toxic than the final-form fibrils. Their findings are the first to pinpoint sheet formation at the toxic intermediate stage in the misfolding of the Alzheimer’s amyloid protein and support the notion that the process of forming the layered sheet structure might be what triggers toxicity and kills nerve cells.

“Our method characterized the detailed molecular structure of this unstable, intermediate species,” Ishii said. “To the best of our knowledge, this is the first characterization of detailed molecular structures for toxic amyloid intermediates. We found that the structure was very similar to the final (fibril) form, which wasn’t expected at all.”

Ishii said a complete determination of the intermediate structure remains to be done, but he is confident his lab will be able to do that. Once completed, the findings may provide pharmaceutical manufacturers with the information they need to create drugs that will prevent interaction between the toxic molecules and nerve cells.

Ishii said the method can also be applied to structural studies of proteins associate with other neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s, and prion diseases, such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob.

“We’re also interested in applying our technique in the nanoscience field to examine the formation process of peptide-based nano-assemblies,” he said.

The findings were reported online yesterday in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.

UIC students co-authoring the paper include former doctoral student Sandra Chimon, candidates Medhat Shaibat, Christopher Jones and Buzulagu Aizezi, and former undergraduate Diana Calero.

Funding was provided by the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, the Dreyfus Foundation and the Alzheimer’s Association.

Source: University of Illinois at Chicago

Study Finds Asthma Linked to PTSD

Posted by sara | Posted in Asthma, Health, Tips | Posted on 11-09-2007

A recent study has linked asthma with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among adults. The study of male twins who were veterans of the Vietnam era suggests that the association between asthma and PTSD is not primarily explained by common genetic influences.

The study included 3,065 male twin pairs, who had lived together in childhood, and who had both served on active military duty during the Vietnam War. According to the findings, among all twins, those who suffered from the most PTSD symptoms were 2.3 times as likely to have asthma compared with those who suffered from the least PTSD symptoms.

The study included both identical twins, who share all the same genetic material, and fraternal twins, who share only half of the same genetic material. “If there had been a strong genetic component to the link between asthma and PTSD, the results between these two types of twins would have been different, but we didn’t find substantial differences between the two,” said lead researcher Renee D. Goodwin, PhD, assistant professor of Epidemiology at the Mailman School of Public Health.

Several other studies have found a relationship between asthma and other anxiety disorders, Dr. Goodwin noted, yet this study is the first to investigate the link between asthma and PTSD. This new research also confirmed previous findings that linked asthma with a higher risk of depression. “The reason (s) for the association between asthma and mental disorders is not known,” she said. “Asthma could increase the risk of anxiety disorders, or anxiety disorders might cause asthma, or there could be common risk factors for both asthma and anxiety disorders. Our study found the association between asthma and PTSD does not appear to be primarily due to a common genetic predisposition.”

The researchers found the association between asthma and PTSD existed even after they took into account factors such as cigarette smoking, obesity and socioeconomic status, all of which are associated with both anxiety disorders and asthma.

“It is conceivable that traumatic stress, which has been associated with compromised immune functioning, leads to increased vulnerability to immune-system-related diseases, including asthma,” Dr. Goodwin and colleagues wrote. “Alternatively, it may be that having asthma places adults at increased risk for PTSD as it increases the likelihood that they will be exposed to a traumatic situation because they have a life-threatening chronic medical condition.”

The findings suggest that a person with asthma who experiences a traumatic event may benefit from seeking professional help, because they could be more vulnerable to developing post-traumatic stress disorder, Dr. Goodwin said.

The study was conducted by researchers at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health and published in the first issue for November 2007 of the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, published by the American Thoracic Society.